CS代考 don¡¯t believe that pthread_cond_signal/broadcast() – cscodehelp代写

by Posted on

don¡¯t believe that pthread_cond_signal/broadcast()
can be called without locking the mutex
321 0
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
POSIX Condition Variables
Guarded command
POSIX implementation
when (guard) [
statement 1;
…
statement n;
]
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
while(!guard)
pthread_cond_wait(
&cv,
&mutex);
statement 1;
…
statement n;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
[ /* code
* modifying
* the guard
*/
]
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
/*code modifying the guard:*/
…
pthread_cond_broadcast(&cv);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
1
Copyright ý . -Writers Problem
W WW
data
RRR RRRRR R
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
R
R
R
2
321 0
Copyright ý . Cheng

reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
writer( ) {
when ((writers == 0) &&
}
readers++; ]
/* read */
[readers–;]
(readers == 0)) [
writers++;
]
/* write */
[writers–;]
Readers-Writers Pseudocode
this is synchronization code
321 0
}
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
3
Copyright ý . Cheng

reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
writer( ) {
when ((writers == 0) &&
(readers == 0)) [
writers++;
]
// sanity check
assert((readers == 0) &&
(writers == 1));
}
Pseudocode with Assertions
readers++; ]
// sanity check
assert((writers == 0) &&
(readers > 0));
/* read */
[readers–;]
/* write */
[writers–;]
the sanity checks are really not necessary
}
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
4
321 0
Copyright ý . Cheng

reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
writer( ) {
when ((writers == 0) &&
readers++; ]
/* read */
[readers–;]
(readers == 0)) [
writers++;
]
/* write */
[writers–;]
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
Readers-Writers Pseudocode
}
}
since readers is part of the guard in the implementation of [readers–;], you may need to signal/broadcast the corresponding condition used to implement that guard
in this case, only have to signal if readers becomes 0 (if the guard may become true)
5
321 0
Copyright ý . Cheng

reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
writer( ) {
when ((writers == 0) &&
(readers == 0)) [
writers++;
]
/* write */
[writers–;]
}
in this case, signal/browdcast if writers becomes 0
}
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
Readers-Writers Pseudocode
readers++; ]
/* read */
[readers–;]
also, since writers is part of the guards (and these two guards are not identical), in the implementation of [writers–;], you may need to signal/broadcast the corresponding conditions used to implement these guards
(if the guard may become true) Copyright ý . Cheng
321 0
6

reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
writer( ) {
when ((writers == 0) &&
readers++; ]
/* read */
[readers–;]
(readers == 0)) [
writers++;
]
/* write */
[writers–;]
Readers-Writers Pseudocode
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
}
don¡¯t have to worry about this readers don¡¯t have to worry about this writers
you need to look at your program logic and figure when signal/broadcast conditions won¡¯t be useful
it¡¯s not wrong to signal/broadcast here, it¡¯s just
wasteful/inefficient
321 0
}
7
Copyright ý . Cheng

reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
writer( ) {
when ((writers == 0) &&
}
readers++; ]
/* read */
[readers–;]
(readers == 0)) [
writers++;
]
/* write */
[writers–;]
Readers-Writers Pseudocode
writers behaves like a binary semaphore readers behaves like a counting semaphore but they are not semaphores
due to the definition of a semaphore
}
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
8
321 0
Copyright ý . Cheng

reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
readers++; ]
/* read */
[readers–;]
}
writer( ) {
when ((writers == 0) &&
}
(readers == 0)) [
writers++;
]
/* write */
[writers–;]
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
Solution with POSIX Threads
“Serialization Box”
read/write
execute
execute
execute execute
writers, readers
CS1
CS2
CS3
CS4
CV readersQ CV writersQ
to be even more “efficient”, can use multiple CVs
so you don¡¯t have to wake up a thread unnecessarily here we use one CV for
m
reader¡¯s guard and one CV for writer¡¯s guard (since we want to wake them up separately)
321 0
9
Copyright ý . Systems – CSCI 402
Recall POSIX Guarded Command Implementation
Guarded command
POSIX implementation
when (guard) [
statement 1;
…
statement n;
]
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
while(!guard)
pthread_cond_wait(
&cv,
&mutex);
statement 1;
…
statement n;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
[ /* code
* modifying
* the guard
*/
]
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
/*code modifying the guard:*/
…
pthread_cond_broadcast(&cv);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
10
321 0
Copyright ý . Cheng

}
Solution with POSIX Threads
reader( ) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
while (!(writers == 0))
writer( ) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
while(!((readers == 0) &&
pthread_cond_wait(
&readersQ, &m);
readers++;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
/* read */
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
if (–readers == 0)
pthread_cond_signal(
&writersQ);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
(writers == 0)))
pthread_cond_wait(
&writersQ, &m);
writers++;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
/* write */
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
writers–;
pthread_cond_signal(
&writersQ);
pthread_cond_broadcast(
&readersQ);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
one mutex (m) and two condition variables (readersQ and writersQ)
321 0
}
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
11
Copyright ý . Cheng

reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
reader( ) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
while (!(writers == 0))
pthread_cond_wait(
&readersQ, &m);
readers++;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
/* read */
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
if (–readers == 0)
pthread_cond_signal(
&writersQ);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
}
}
readers++; ]
/* read */
[readers–;]
Solution with POSIX Threads
one mutex (m) and two condition variables (readersQ and writersQ)
321 0
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
12
Copyright ý . Cheng

(readers
writers++;
]
/* write */
[writers–;]
}
== 0)) [
one mutex writersQ)
(m) and two condition variables (readersQ and
Solution with POSIX Threads
writer( ) {
when ((writers == 0) &&
writer( ) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
while(!((readers == 0) &&
}
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
(writers == 0)))
pthread_cond_wait(
&writersQ, &m);
writers++;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
/* write */
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
writers–;
pthread_cond_signal(
&writersQ);
pthread_cond_broadcast(
&readersQ);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
13
321 0
Copyright ý . Cheng

reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
writer( ) {
when ((writers == 0) &&
(readers == 0)) [
writers++;
]
/* write */
[writers–;]
}
readers++; ]
/* read */
[readers–;]
The Starvation Problem
writer can do the actual writing at a time
321 0
}
Can the writer never get a chance to write?
yes, if there are always readers
so, this implementation can be unfair to writers
Solution
once a writer arrives, shut the door on new readers
writers now means the number of writers wanting to write use active_writers to make sure that only one
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
14
Copyright ý . The Starvation Problem
reader( ) {
when (writers == 0) [
readers++; ]
/* read */
writer( ) {
[writers++;]
when ((readers == 0) &&
(active_writers == 0))
[
[readers–;] }]
active_writers++;
/* write */
[ writers–;
active_writers–;
] }
now it¡¯s unfair to the readers
isn¡¯t writing more important than reading anyway?
This is an example of how to give threads priority without assigning priorities to threads!
Operating Systems – CSCI 402
15
321 0
Copyright ý . Systems – CSCI 402
Improved Reader
reader( ) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
while (!(writers == 0))
pthread_cond_wait(
&readersQ, &m);
readers++;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
/* read */
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
if (–readers == 0)
pthread_cond_signal(
&writersQ);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
}
exactly the same as before!
16
321 0
Copyright ý . Systems – CSCI 402
Improved Writer
writer( ) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
writers++;
while (!((readers == 0) &&
(active_writers == 0))) {
pthread_cond_wait(&writersQ, &m);
}
active_writers++;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
/* write */
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
writers–;
active_writers–;
if (writers > 0)
pthread_cond_signal(&writersQ);
else
pthread_cond_broadcast(&readersQ);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
}
17
321 0
Copyright ý . Systems – CSCI 402
New, From POSIX!
int pthread_rwlock_init(
pthread_rwlock_t *lock,
pthread_rwlockattr_t *att);
int pthread_rwlock_destroy(
pthread_rwlock_t *lock);
int pthread_rwlock_rdlock(
pthread_rwlock_t *lock);
int pthread_rwlock_wrlock(
pthread_rwlock_t *lock);
int pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(
pthread_rwlock_t *lock);
int pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(
pthread_rwlock_t *lock);
int pthread_timedrwlock_rdlock(
pthread_rwlock_t *lock, struct timespec *ts);
int pthread_timedrwlock_wrlock(
pthread_rwlock_t *lock, struct timespec *ts);
int pthread_rwlock_unlock(
pthread_rwlock_t *lock);
18
321 0
Copyright ý . Systems – CSCI 402
Barriers
When a thread reaches a barrier, it must stop (do nothing) and simply wait for other threads to arrive at the same barrier when all the threads that were suppose to arrive at the
barrier have all arrived at the barrier, they are all given the signal to proceed forward
the barrier is then reset
Ex: fork/join (fork to create parallel execution)
321 0
19
Copyright ý . Systems – CSCI 402
A Solution?
int count = 0;
pthread_mutex_t m;
pthread_cond_t BarrierQueue;
void barrier_sync() {
pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
if (++count < n) { pthread_cond_wait(&BarrierQueue, &m); } else { count = 0; pthread_cond_broadcast(&BarrierQueue); } pthread_mutex_unlock(&m); } the idea here is to have the last thread broadcast the condition while all the other threads are blocked at waiting for the condition to be signaled as it turns out, pthread_cond_wait() might return spontaneously, so this won¡¯t work http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/functions/pthread_cond_signal.html 321 0 20 Copyright ý . Systems - CSCI 402 A Solution? int count = 0; pthread_mutex_t m; pthread_cond_t BarrierQueue; void barrier_sync() { pthread_mutex_lock(&m); if (++count < n) { while (count < n) pthread_cond_wait(&BarrierQueue, &m); } else { pthread_cond_broadcast(&BarrierQueue); count = 0; } pthread_mutex_unlock(&m); } if the n th thread wakes up all the other blocked threads, most likely, none of these threads will see count == n 321 0 21 Copyright ý . Cheng if the n th thread wakes up all the other blocked threads, most likely, none of these threads will see count == n moving count = 0 around won¡¯t help cannot guarantee all n threads will exit the barrier Copyright ý . Cheng 321 0 22 Operating Systems - CSCI 402 A Solution? int count = 0; pthread_mutex_t m; pthread_cond_t BarrierQueue; void barrier_sync() { pthread_mutex_lock(&m); if (++count < n) { while (count < n) pthread_cond_wait(&BarrierQueue, &m); } else { pthread_cond_broadcast(&BarrierQueue); } pthread_mutex_unlock(&m); count = 0; } Operating Systems - CSCI 402 Barrier in POSIX Threads int count = 0; pthread_mutex_t m; pthread_cond_t BarrierQueue; void barrier_sync() { pthread_mutex_lock(&m); if (++count < number) { int my_generation = generation; while(my_generation == generation) pthread_cond_wait(&BarrierQueue, &m); } else { count = 0; generation++; pthread_cond_broadcast(&BarrierQueue); } pthread_mutex_unlock(&m); } don¡¯t use count in the guard since its problematic! introduce a new guard (with a new variable) 321 0 23 Copyright ý . Systems - CSCI 402 More From POSIX! int pthread_barrier_init( pthread_barrier_t *barrier, pthread_barrierattr_t *attr, unsigned int count); int pthread_barrier_destroy( pthread_barrier_t *barrier); int pthread_barrier_wait( pthread_barrier_t *barrier); 24 321 0 Copyright ý . Cheng

Published by admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *