CS代考计算机代写 algorithm database Semester Two 2020

Semester Two 2020
Supplementary Exam – Alternative Assessment Task
STUDENT ID:
SURNAME:
GIVEN NAME:
UNIT CODE:
UNIT TITLE:
ASSESSMENT DURATION:
ETF3500-ETF5500
High Dimensional Data Analysis
2 hours 40 minutes (includes reading, downloading, and uploading time)
 This is an individual assessment task.
 This is an open book exam
 All responses must be included in the RMARKDOWN template document available on Moodle, and then rendered into a pdf document.
 ALL STUDENTS are required to answer questions A, B, C and D. ETF3500 students are required to answer question E.
ETF5500 students are required to answer question F.
 This assessment accounts for 50% of the total in the unit.
 Any model of calculator is allowed.
 Upon completion of this assessment task, please upload the pdf document to Moodle using the assignment submission link.
 Your submission must occur within 2 hours and 40 minutes of the official commencement of this assessment task (Australian Eastern Daylight Time).
Page 1 of 4

Please read the next page carefully and sign and date the Student Statement before commencing the assessment task.
Page 2 of 4

Intentional plagiarism or collusion amounts to cheating under Part 7 of the Monash University (Council) Regulations
Plagiarism: Plagiarism means taking and using another person’s ideas or manner of expressing them and passing them off as one’s own. For example, by failing to give appropriate acknowledgment. The material used can be from any source (staff, students or the internet, published and unpublished works).
Collusion: Collusion means unauthorised collaboration with another person on assessable written, oral or practical work and includes paying another person to complete all or part of the work.
Where there are reasonable grounds for believing that intentional plagiarism or collusion has occurred, this will be reported to the Associate Dean (Education) or delegate, who may disallow the work concerned by prohibiting assessment or refer the matter to the Faculty Discipline Panel for a hearing.
Student Statement:
 I have read the university’s Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedures.
 I understand the consequences of engaging in plagiarism and collusion as described in
Part 7 of the Monash University (Council) Regulations
https://www.monash.edu/legal/legislation/current-statute-regulations-and-related-
resolutions
 I have taken proper care to safeguard this work and made all reasonable efforts to ensure it could not be copied.
 I have not used any unauthorised materials in the completion of this assessment task.
 No part of this assessment has been previously submitted as part of another unit/course.
 I acknowledge and agree that the assessor of this assessment task may for the purposes
of assessment, reproduce the assessment and:
i. provide to another member of faculty and any external marker; and/or
ii. submit it to a text-matching software; and/or
iii. submit it to a text-matching software which may then retain a copy of the
assessment on its database for the purpose of future plagiarism checking.
 I certify that I have not plagiarised the work of others or participated in unauthorised
collaboration when preparing this assessment.
Signature: (Type your full name) Date:
Privacy Statement
The information on this form is collected for the primary purpose of assessing your assessment and ensuring the academic integrity requirements of the University are met. Other purposes of collection include recording your plagiarism and collusion declaration, attending to the course and administrative matters and statistical analyses. If you choose not to complete all the questions on this form it may not be possible for Monash University to assess your assessment task. You have a right to access personal information that Monash University holds about you, subject to any exceptions in relevant legislation. If you wish to seek access to your personal information or inquire about the handling of your personal information, please contact the University Privacy Officer: privacyofficer@adm.monash.edu.au
Page 3 of 4

MARKS ALLOCATED TO QUESTIONS WITHIN THIS ASSESSMENT TASK
Question
A
B
C
D
E/F
TOTAL
Allocated Marks
10
5
10
15
10
50
Office Use Only
Mark received
A
B
C
D
E/F
TOTAL
Second marking
Page 4 of 4

The exam
This exam uses simulated data that emulates SOME features of the Australian labour market. By now, you should have access to your data set which is produced according to your student ID. The dataset provides 9 attributes on 500 individuals who speak English as their first language. The following variables are provided in the dataset:
surname: Surname of the individual.
income: Yearly income (dollars).
experience: Work experience (years).
age: Age of the individual (years).
gender: Gender of the individual.
sector: Industry of work.
second_language: Second language spoken by the individual. education_years: Total number of tertiary education years. siblings: Total number of siblings.
Based on this information you must answer the questions below. Code to produce each of the R outputs in your answers must be provided.
Page 5 of 11

A Standardisation and Distance (10 Marks)
The following question only requires you to use the variables Income, Education Years and Age.
1. Standardise income, education_years and age by centering (subtracting the mean) and scaling (dividing by the standard deviation) using the scale function. Print out the first 5 observations. (1 Mark)
2. From your answer to Q1, what is the standardised value of age for the first observation (Nichols) in your data (1 Mark)
3. The government proposes a currency reform, introducing new dollars that are exchanged at a rate of 100 to 1. The effect of this is that every income should be divided by 100. Create a variable NewIncome which is equal to Income divided by 100 (NewIncome is only to be used for question A). (1 Mark)
4. Find the Manhattan Distance between the first and second observation (Nichols and Fisher) using income, education_years and age as the variables. Do NOT standardise the data (1 Mark)
5. Find the Manhattan Distance between the first and second observation (Nichols and Fisher) using new income, education_years and age as the variables. Do NOT standardise the data (1 Mark)
6. Are the answers to Question 4 and Question 5 the same? Why or why not? (2 Marks) 7. How would your answer to question 6 change, if Euclidean distance were used in Question
4 and Question 5? (1 Mark)
8. Explain the role that distance plays in collaborative filtering for recommender systems. (2 Marks)
Page 6 of 11

B Clustering and multidimensional scaling (5 Marks)
1. Use complete linkage to conduct Cluster Analysis for all the individuals in the Health sector. Use numeric variables only. (1 Mark)
2. Construct a dendogram where the 3-cluster solution is highlighted. (1 Mark) 3. Provide the centroids of the 3-cluster solution. (1 Mark)
4. Use Multidimensional Scaling to provide a 2-dimensional representation of the same observations used in Question 1. (1 Mark)
5. Produce a scatter plot with the 2-dimensional MDS representation. Colour the points according to the cluster membership for the 3-cluster solution in Question 2. (1 Mark)
Page 7 of 11

C Principal Components Analysis (10 Marks)
1. Carry out Principal Components on the data using all numeric variables. (2 Marks) 2. Did you standardise the variables? Why or why not? (2 Marks)
3. What is the weight on age for the 3rd principal component? (1 Mark)
4. What is the variance of the 4th principal component? (1 Mark)
5. Make a Scree plot. (1 Mark)
6. According to the Scree plot how many principal components should be used in the analysis.
How did you choose this value? (2 Marks)
7. How many principal components would be used in the analysis if Kaiser’s rule were used?
(1 Mark)
Page 8 of 11

D Multidimensional Scaling (15 Marks)
1. Using only those observations for which second_language is Chinese, carry out classical multidimensional scaling. Find a two dimensional representation and use standardised value of income, experience, age, education_years and siblings as the variables. (4 Marks)
2. Plot a 2-dimensional representation of this data. Rather than plot the observations as points use the individuals’ surnames. (3 Marks)
3. Name two individuals (by surname) who are similar according to your plot in Question 2, and two individuals (by surname) who are different. If you were unable to generate the plot in Question 2, then describe how you would answer this question. (1 Mark)
4. Plot the same plot as in Question 2 using Kruskal’s algorithm. (3 Marks)
5. Are your conclusions in Question 3 robust to using a different multidimensional scaling method? If you were unable to generate the plot in Question 2 and/or Question 4, then describe how you would answer this question. (1 Mark)
6. Describe the differences between classical multidimensional scaling and Kruskal’s algorithm.
(3 Marks)
Page 9 of 11

E Correspondence analysis (ETF3500 students only) (10 Marks)
1. Construct a contingency table between the sector and second_language variables. Only consider those individuals with at most three education_years (1 Mark)
2. Using the contingency table in point 1, perform correspondance analysis on the sector and second_language variables and visualise the results. (2 Marks)
3. Based on the results in point 2, what language is most similar to Greek?. (1 Mark)
4. Based on the results in point 2, how much inertia is explained by the first dimension? (1
Mark)
5. Repeat point 2, but this time, only consider those individuals whose income is less than $100000 or whose number of siblings is more than one. (2 Marks)
6. Based on the results in point 5, which sector is the most similar to Construction?(1 Mark)
7. Compute how much inertia is explained overall by the figures in points 2 and 5. Discuss in which of these two exercises CA helps explain a larger amount of inertia. (2 Marks)
Page 10 of 11

F Correspondence analysis (ETF5500 students only) (10 Marks)
1. Using only individuals whose gender is Male and whose income is at least $100000, construct a contingency table between the sector and second_language variables. (1 Mark)
2. Using the contingency table in point 1, perform correspondance analysis on the sector and second_language variables and visualise the results. (1 Mark)
3. Based on the results in point 2, which sector is most associated to people that speak Spanish as a second language?. (1 Mark)
4. Based on the results in point 2, how much inertia is explained by the first dimension? (1 Mark)
5. Repeat point 2, but this time, only consider those individuals whose gender is Male and whose income is less than $100000. (1 Mark)
6. Based on the results in point 5, which language is most associated with the Health sector? (1 Mark)
7. Compute how much inertia is explained overall by the figures in points 2 and 5. Discuss in which of these two exercises CA helps explain a larger amount of inertia. (1 Mark)
8. Disscuss the differences or similarities between the results obtained in points 2 and 5, for example, are the associations between sector and second_language consistent? (1 Mark)
9. In your own words, describe the connection between the chi square statistic and correspon- dace analysis (2 Marks)
END OF EXAMINATION
Page 11 of 11