程序代写代做代考 Slide 1

Slide 1

Answers to Some Predicate Logic
Formalisation Exercises from the

Predicate Logic Notes

1

Predicates to be used:

lecTheatre/1

office/1

contains/2

lecturer/1

has/2

same/2

phd/1

supervises/2

happy/1

completePhd/1

2

1.

311 is a lecture theatre and 447 is an office.

311 is a lecture theatre and 447 is an office

lecTheatre(311)  office(447)

3

2. Every lecture theatre contains a projector.

Every lecture theatre contains a projector.

X ( → )

Every

Any Map to 

All

Everyone

….

4

Every lecture theatre contains a projector.

X (lecTheatre(X) → )

X (lecTheatre(X) → contains(X, projector))

Alternatively:

X (lecTheatre(X) →

Y (projector(Y)  contains(X, Y)))

5

A universally quantified wff is usually like this:

X ( → )

Or like this:

X (  )

That is their principle connective is

→ or .

6

3. Every office contains a telephone and either a desktop or a laptop
computer.

Every office contains a telephone and either a desktop or a laptop computer.
X (office(X) → …….)
… contains a telephone and either a desktop or a laptop computer.
X (office(X) →( ….  …))
X (office(X) →(contains(X, telephone)  (…)))

… either a desktop or a laptop computer.

X (office(X) →(contains(X, telephone)  ( …  …)))
X (office(X) →(contains(X, telephone) 
(contains(X, desktop)  contains(X, laptop))))

7

4. Every lecturer has at least one office.

Every lecturer has at least one office.

X (lecturer(X) → … )

… has at least one office.

X (lecturer(X) → Y (office(Y)  has(X, Y)))

8

At least one

Some map to 

One

….

9

An existentially quantified wff is usually like
this:

X (  )

Or like this:

X (  )

That is their principle connective is

 or .

10

5. No lecturer has more than one office.

No lecturer has more than one office.

Not any lecturer has more than one office.

(There does not exist a lecturer who has more
than one office.)

¬L (lecturer(L)  L has more than one office)

¬L (lecturer(L)  L has at least 2 offices that are
not the same)

11

¬L (lecturer(L)  there are at least 2 offices that
L has and are not the same)

¬L (lecturer(L) 

O1 O2 (office(O1)  office(O2) 

has(L, O1)  has(L, O2) 
¬same(O1,O2)))

12

There are other ways of doing 5. For example:

L (lecturer(L) → ¬ (O1 O2 (office(O1) 
office(O2)  has(L, O1)  has(L, O2) 
¬same(O1,O2)))

L O1 O2 (lecturer(L)  office(O1) 
office(O2)  has(L, O1)  has(L, O2) →
same(O1,O2))

13

6. No lecturers share offices with anyone.

Try it …..

7. Some lecturers supervise PhD students and
some do not.

(L …..)  (L …..) or

(L1 …..)  (L2 …..)

14

Some lecturers supervise PhD students and
some do not.

(L (lecturer(L)  there is at least one PhD
student that L supervises)) 

(L (lecturer(L)  there is not at least one PhD
student that L supervises))

(L (lecturer(L)  S (phd(S) supervises(L,S))))

(L (lecturer(L)  ¬S (phd(S)  supervises(L,S))))

15

(L (lecturer(L)  S (phd(S) supervises(L,S))))

(L (lecturer(L)  ¬S (phd(S)  supervises(L,S))))

Drop some unneccesary brackets:

L (lecturer(L)  S (phd(S) supervises(L,S)))

L (lecturer(L)  ¬S (phd(S)  supervises(L,S)))

16

8. Each PhD student has an office, but all PhD
students share their office with at least one
other PhD student.

Try it ……

17

9. A lecturer is happy if the PhD students
he/she supervises successfully complete their
PhD.

L (lecturer(L)  his/her PhD students
successfully complete → happy(L))

L (lecturer(L)  all his/her PhD students
successfully complete → happy(L))

L (lecturer(L)  S if S is L’s PhD student then S
successfully completes→ happy(L))

18

L (lecturer(L) 

S if S is L’s PhD student then S successfully
completes→ happy(L))

L (lecturer(L) 

S (phd(S)  supervises(L,S) → completePhD(S))

→ happy(L))

19

10.Not all PhD students complete their PhD.

Try it ….

20

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *