程序代做CS代考 information retrieval database data mining COMP3430 / COMP8430 Data wrangling – cscodehelp代写
COMP3430 / COMP8430 Data wrangling
Lecture 20: Record linkage evaluation (2) (Lecturer: )
Lecture outline
● Clerical review
● Test databases and benchmarks ● Synthetic test data
The record linkage process
Why clerical review?
● The traditional (probabilistic) record linkage process classifies record pairs into the class of potential matches if no clear decision can be made
● These record pairs are given to a domain expert for manual classification
● Manual classification requires inspection of the attribute values
of a record pair, and possibly also external information – Other records about the same entities from related databases
– Information found on the Internet
– Information from the linkage process (how many other similar records
are there – is a record pair unique or highly connected?)
Example clerical review (1)
● Question: Do these two records refer to the same person? Is this a good way to support clerical review?
Example clerical review (2)
Using clerical review results to improve classification
Clerical review results to improve classification
● A major challenge with record linkage classification is the lack of ground truth data in many applications
– Preventing the use of supervised machine learning classification techniques
● The clerical review process generates training data
– Of the difficult to classify cases
– These can be used in a process called active learning which combines
manual with machine learning based classification
● Recent research has investigated crowed-based approaches to
clerical review (using systems such as Amazon’s Mechanical Turk) – Pay small amount of money for each manual classification
– Applicable only in situations where the data are not sensitive
Test databases and benchmarks (1)
● To evaluate a record linkage system or software, it needs to be
employed on a set of suitable databases from the same domain
– Similar in size and characteristics to the databases it will be deployed on
– Ground truth needs to be available in these test databases to evaluate
blocking and linkage quality (pairs completeness, pairs quality, precision, recall, etc.)
● It is generally very difficult to obtain such test databases
– Because in record linkage we often need personal details of people
– Linking product or bibliographic databases (which are publicly available)
will not be helpful for linking personal data
Test databases and benchmarks (2)
● In other research areas (databases, data mining, machine
learning, information retrieval) there are publicly available
test data collections or even benchmarking systems – Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC)
– UCI Machine Learning and KDD Repository
– Text Retrieval Conferences (TREC)
● In record linkage, individual research groups provide small test data collections
Generating and using synthetic data (1)
● Privacy issues prohibit publication of real personal information
● De-identified or encrypted data cannot be used for record linkage
research or evaluation of record linkage systems
(because personal details such as real names and addresses are needed)
● Alternatively, create artificial / synthetic databases for research
and evaluation, with several advantages
– Volume and characteristics can be controlled (errors and variations in
records, number of duplicates, etc.)
– It is known which records are duplicates of each other, and so linkage
quality can be calculated
– Data and the data generator program can be published
Generating and using synthetic data (2)
● Creating synthetic data is usually a two step process
– First generate data based on lookup tables with real values and their
distributions (name and address values and their frequencies), and functions that generate values following real distributions (age, salary, blood pressure, etc.), and that model dependencies between attributes
– Then corrupt the generated data using realistic corruption functions (such as typos, phonetic variations, OCR errors, etc)
● Various data generators have been developed, including at ANU: http://dmm.anu.edu.au/geco/ (GeCo generator / corruptor)
Modelling of variations and errors
Example of generated data
RecID
Age
GivenName
Surname
Street
Suburb
rec-1-org
33
Beechboro
rec-1-dup-0
33
Madisoi
Solomon
rec-1-dup-1
Bechboro
rec-2-org
39
Maltby Street
Burrawang
rec-2-dup-0
39
Maltby Street
Burawang
rec-2-dup-1
39
Desire
Contreras
Maltby Street
Buahrawang
rec-3-org
81
Howitt Street
Nangiloc
rec-3-dup-0
87
Madisvn
Sergeant
Hovvitt Street
Nanqiloc
● rec-1: typing/abbreviations; rec-2: phonetic; rec-3: OCR ● Generated using the Febrl and GeCo data generators
